The Science of Fear – Part II

by Stephen Mills on January 13, 2010

Scared

This is the second part of my article on The Science of Fear: Why We Fear the Things We Shouldn’t–and Put Ourselves in Greater Danger by Daniel Gardner.  If you have not read Part I of this article, please do so: The Science of Fear – Part I.  Part I describes the reasons behind our fears and Part II will discuss relevant risk numbers and how they relate to current events.

How Likely Is It?

Most of our exposure to dangers or risk in the media leaves out a crucially important factor.  What is the likelihood of it actually happening to you?  If you are told taking a new kind of birth control increases your risk of breast cancer by 20% compared to an existing type, that may sound bad but you have learned nothing useful.  If the existing risk is 0.10% and the risk of the new type is 0.12% (increasing from 1 in 1,000 to 1.2 in 1,000), that is essentially irrelevant if there is any advantage of taking the new type.  For example, fewer side effects or greater convenience.  In either case this risk is very low and the difference is probably less than the margin of error anyway.  You simply cannot make reasonable decisions about behavior without knowing actual baseline risks.

What is a Significant Risk?

In addition to knowing the actual risk you have to decide if that risk crosses any kind of threshold and what if any behavioral change you should take in response to it.  If you don’t take the time to understand the actual situation, you are doomed to be ruled by irrational fears.  Some risk is worth a response and some is not.  It depends upon the likelihood of the event happening and the cost of altering behavior in response.  You aren’t going to get that from media stories or what other people think.  Your caveman brain is simply not equipped to intuitively deal with risk in our modern and connected world.  Here is my personal view of various levels of risk.

  • 25.0% (1 in 4) If I am at 25.0% risk of something dangerous, I consider that an enormous risk that requires action.  If I live to be very old, say 100, my lifetime risk of cancer is probably somewhere around 25.0%.
  • 1.0% (1 in 100) Let’s say my annual risk of some danger is 1%.  To me that’s a pretty significant risk and if there are things I can do to reduce it, I will.  High mountain climbing might fall into this category.  I’ve read that around 3% of Everest climbers die on the attempt.  Even if I was capable of climbing Everest I wouldn’t because that risk is too high.  But there are people to whom that risk is worth it.  It is still relatively low and 97 out of 100 will come back alive.
  • 0.1% (1 in 1,000) This is getting to the point where I personally don’t expend much thought about it.  Obviously if there is an easy way to avoid it without much cost or crimping my style, then I would.  Things like violence (not murder but assault) at school fall into this range.
  • 0.01% (1 in 10,000) This is the level where some risk management experts (or legal institutions) starting talking about de minimis.  This means too insignificant for concern.  This level is de minimis for me.  This is in the range of the annual risk for dying in a car accident in the U.S.  I wouldn’t avoid driving anywhere at any time as a result of this risk and most people I know don’t either.  But, I fasten my restraints because they are no cost to me to do so and they also reduce the risk of injury which is far more likely than death.
  • 0.001% (1 in 100,000) or 0.0001% (1 in 1,000,000) These are so microscopically unlikely I wouldn’t waste 1 second of my life worrying about them and I don’t think anyone else should either.  And yet you may be surprised at what falls into these categories or are even more unlikely.

Risks

32.0% – Rate of overweight children in U.S.
3.0% – Risk of death from climbing mount Everest
2.0% – Rate of women aged 50 having breast cancer
0.016% – Annual U.S. risk of childhood cancer
0.013% – Annual U.S. risk of death in a car accident
0.010% – Annual U.S. risk of death from the flu
0.0047% – Annual U.S. risk of being murdered
0.0028% – 2009 death risk from swine flu
0.0001% – Annual U.S. risk for accidently suffocating in your own bed
0.0001% – Annual U.S. risk for dying in terrorist attack
0.00007% – Annual U.S. risk of teenager or child being abducted by a stranger and killed or not returned
0.00006% – Annual U.S. risk of being murdered at school (e.g. Columbine)
0.0000013% – Annual worldwide risk of shark attack

Factoids To Make You Think

  • There are probably 1,000,000 naturally occurring chemicals in foods and 50% of them are carcinogenic in lab tests
  • If terrorists took down a commercial airliner in the U.S. every single week and you took a plane trip once a month, you would still be more likely to die driving to the airport than on the airplane.
  • If you bought a lottery ticket on Monday, you would be 2,500 times as likely to die before the Saturday drawing than you would be to win the drawing.
  • You are 30 times as likely to be killed by lightning than by a shark

What do you think?  Leave a comment and join the conversation.

arrow-small

Get Free Updates to The Rat Race Trap by Email here or via a reader in the top left sidebar.  I would love to have you on board.

Related posts:

  1. The Science of Fear – Part I Fear is an important emotion that had extremely important survival...
  2. Should You Trust Your Intuition? – Part II Clearly our intuitive or non-conscious mind is a powerful tool...
  3. What You Need to Know About Your Amazing Brain – Part I We are on the threshold of something truly great. I’m...
  4. Should You Trust Your Intuition? I’m a strong believer in the power of human intuition,...
  5. Develop the Courage to Take Risks You will seldom lose anything of value by pursuing your...

{ 1 trackback }

The Science of Fear – Part I
January 13, 2010 at 9:36 pm

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Lana-DreamFollowers Blog January 14, 2010 at 2:14 am

wow, loved those numbers Stephen and actually feel better after reading them:) Thank you!
.-= Lana-DreamFollowers Blog´s last blog ..My 2010 Goals and 2 Awesome Techniques I Used to Set Them. =-.

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 8:58 am

Great Lana! I’m glad it helped. Thanks for commenting.

Reply

Jay Schryer January 14, 2010 at 9:16 am

These are great numbers! It really puts it all into perspective, doesn’t it?

Personally, I still check the bushes at my apartment complex for lurking lions, but that’s just me ;)
.-= Jay Schryer´s last blog ..The Miracle =-.

Reply

Derrick January 14, 2010 at 10:32 am

lol…good one!

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 8:59 am

Hi Jay. LOL. Yes it does put it in perspective. This is a topic that requires cold analysis. Thank you for your comments.

Reply

Derrick January 14, 2010 at 10:31 am

Brilliant! I just read 1 and 2 together. That does say it all. I so feel the philosophy behind that.

Thanks

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 9:01 am

Derrick, thank you so much for you continued support and participation!

Reply

dianne lien January 14, 2010 at 11:19 pm

Insightful. Honesty that is refreshing. What is the chance…the rules of probability. The Good/Bad rule really strikes home. What feels good but is bad for you, is considered less dangerous than say, a terrorist attack happening. Perspective. Thank you for sharing your understanding of Fear. We need to have more people making sense of what reality really is. Another thought, after something has happened, see the change…what fear set in motion. Excellent blog. Thank you, again.

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 9:04 am

Hello Dianne. Thank you for joining us here and for your insightful comment. Perspective and a careful analysis of probability is critical in thinking about risk.

Reply

Earl January 16, 2010 at 12:26 am

It’s amazing how irrational our fear is. Even apart from fearing things that can kill us, we often find our lives dictated by fears that are completely unfounded. When’s the last time a cockroach mugged someone? Yet, we often run away from them as if they’re about to attack.
.-= Earl´s last blog ..How Apartment Hunting Taught Me About Goals…And Jambalaya =-.

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 9:13 am

Hi Earl, I love it – fear of cockroaches! Excellent point and thanks for commenting.

Reply

Jonny January 16, 2010 at 9:09 am

Great post Stephen and the numbers effectively highlight how irrational we can be, however sometimes knowing the numbers will change slightly. For examples when I was swimming with 7 foot bull sharks off the coast of Thailand I think my chances of being attacked were, although low, significantly higher then someone who has never swam in the sea.
.-= Jonny´s last blog ..The Glamorous Ferrari Driving Life Of A First Time Entrepreneur =-.

Reply

Stephen Mills January 16, 2010 at 9:16 am

Hello Jonny, of course that is correct. If you never drive you aren’t going to die in a car accident either. But your example is perfect. The number of shark deaths are so microscopically small in an absolute amount that it cannot be considered a significant risk even if you lived in the water. Thanks for your comments.

Reply

Nea | Self Improvement Saga January 17, 2010 at 9:41 am

I love the factoids you included at the end. They really do make you think.

I personally try to alleviate fear even if the risk are supposedly high. I just can’t see any benefit in worrying. Even if there was a 99% chance that the world will come to an end in 2012, I focus on getting as much joy into each of my remaining days as possible. Unless I’m in imminent danger (as in a psycho with a big knife to my throat or my car spinning out of control)…. No Fear!
.-= Nea | Self Improvement Saga´s last blog ..Peer Pressure and Conformity: Do You Fear Standing Out from the Crowd? =-.

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge